{"text_format":"dbase-jsonl-2026-09-30","columns":[{"name":"id","type":"number","width":9,"decimals":0},{"name":"mscale","type":"number","width":9,"decimals":0},{"name":"Created","type":"character","width":25},{"name":"Modified","type":"character","width":25},{"name":"UserName","type":"character","width":20},{"name":"Issue","type":"character","width":50},{"name":"Comment","type":"character","width":254},{"name":"PSI","type":"character","width":100},{"name":"NGMC","type":"character","width":50},{"name":"final_comm","type":"character","width":150}],"n_rows":14,"rows_kept":14,"cut":false,"deleted_skipped":0,"read_ended":"whole","bounds":"16MiB/16384/4096/first_that_fit","version":"dbase_level_three","encoding_class":"enc_single_byte","reader":"statdb_count/9"}
[1,3399,"09/17/2012","09/17/2012","Charlotte.Odom","Unusual_please_review","Evaluate -point display  looks unusual 16_04634131","This area is a quarry.","OK,1.5-ac pond noted but no action required","good"]
[2,15000,"09/17/2012","09/17/2012","Charlotte.Odom","Data_void","Data Void on 5 tiles 16_05294114_05314114-16, 16_05324116, 16_05324117","FIX; Area has been re-flown to fill data voids.","Please FIX, Thanks!","good"]
[3,15000,"09/17/2012","09/17/2012","Charlotte.Odom","Other HFB","HFB truncated at locaton of DATA VOID 16_05324116","FIX; Area has been re-flown to fill data voids; HFB will be revised.","Please FIX, Thanks!","good"]
[4,10000,"09/17/2012","09/17/2012","Charlotte.Odom","Data_void","5 data holes approx .3-ac 16_04754081-04754083","All data holes are very small ponds.","OK, no action required","good"]
[5,5991,"09/17/2012","09/17/2012","Charlotte.Odom","Unusual_please_review","HFB look misplaced here, please evaluate","Feature is accurately collected as a pond.","OK, no action required","good"]
[6,8813,"09/17/2012","09/17/2012","Charlotte.Odom","Other HFB","Sould HFB have been placed here to connect the 2 hanging double line drainage segments on 16_05294165","Under spec but could be collected for the sake of continuity.","Please use your judgement","good"]
[7,4800,"09/17/2012","09/17/2012","Charlotte.Odom","Other HFB","Should these two HFB segments be connected? 16z-05024129","No; no water present between the two features.","OK, no action required","good"]
[8,24000,"09/19/2012","09/19/2012","charlotte.odom","Other HFB","Should this portion of Little Clifty Creek have HFB? 16_04034090, 16_04034092, 16_04034093","Well under size spec.","OK, no action required","good"]
[9,24000,"09/19/2012","09/19/2012","charlotte.odom","Other HFB","Should this portion of Wolf Lick Creek in Eastern KY have HFB 16_0464089-04904092?","Well under size spec.","OK, no action required","good"]
[10,24000,"09/19/2012","09/19/2012","charlotte.odom","Other HFB","Should this portion of Deer Lick Creek have HFB?","Well under size spec.","OK, no action required","good"]
[18,6000,"09/19/2012","09/19/2012","charlotte.odom","Other HFB","Please evaluate this area of surface mining or other surface distruction where numerous instances of data voids are present 16_04924123, 16_04924125","All voids in points are caused by small areas of ponded water.","OK, no action required","good"]
[19,24000,"09/19/2012","09/19/2012","charlotte.odom","Other HFB","Should this portion of Elk Creek have HFB in 16_04634137 & 16_04634138?","Well under size spec.","OK, no action required","good"]
[20,36000,"09/19/2012","09/19/2012","charlotte.odom","Other HFB","Otter Creek appears to exceed the 10-m nominal width stated in metadata as requiring HFB.  Please evaluate.","Well under size spec in the LiDAR.","OK, no action required","good"]
[21,1746,"09/20/2012","09/20/2012","charlotte.odom","Other HFB","HFB do not seem necessary in what appears to ba simply saturated 16_04634194","Area consistently holds water according to Google historical imagery.","OK, no action required","good"]