09/17/2012
Charlotte.Odom
Unusual_please_review
Evaluate -point display  looks unusual 16_04634131
This area is a quarry.
OK,1.5-ac pond noted but no action required
good
Data_void
Data Void on 5 tiles 16_05294114_05314114-16, 16_05324116, 16_05324117
FIX; Area has been re-flown to fill data voids.
Please FIX, Thanks!
Other HFB
HFB truncated at locaton of DATA VOID 16_05324116
FIX; Area has been re-flown to fill data voids; HFB will be revised.
5 data holes approx .3-ac 16_04754081-04754083
All data holes are very small ponds.
OK, no action required
HFB look misplaced here, please evaluate
Feature is accurately collected as a pond.
Sould HFB have been placed here to connect the 2 hanging double line drainage segments on 16_05294165
Under spec but could be collected for the sake of continuity.
Please use your judgement
Should these two HFB segments be connected? 16z-05024129
No; no water present between the two features.
09/19/2012
charlotte.odom
Should this portion of Little Clifty Creek have HFB? 16_04034090, 16_04034092, 16_04034093
Well under size spec.
Should this portion of Wolf Lick Creek in Eastern KY have HFB 16_0464089-04904092?
Should this portion of Deer Lick Creek have HFB?
Please evaluate this area of surface mining or other surface distruction where numerous instances of data voids are present 16_04924123, 16_04924125
All voids in points are caused by small areas of ponded water.
Should this portion of Elk Creek have HFB in 16_04634137 & 16_04634138?
Otter Creek appears to exceed the 10-m nominal width stated in metadata as requiring HFB.  Please evaluate.
Well under size spec in the LiDAR.
09/20/2012
HFB do not seem necessary in what appears to ba simply saturated 16_04634194
Area consistently holds water according to Google historical imagery.