Classified Point Cloud

Metadata also available as

Metadata:

Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Bohannan Huston, Inc.
Publication_Date: 20150410
Title: Classified Point Cloud
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: LiDAR point cloud
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Santa Fe County 2014 Regional LiDAR Project
Issue_Identification: Classified Point Cloud (SFCO/USGS)
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place:
102 Grant Avenue Santa Fe, NM 87501
Publisher: Santa Fe County
Other_Citation_Details:
This dataset was created as a joint effort between Santa Fe County, the US Geological Survey, Bohannan Huston, Inc. and Aero-Graphics, Inc. in support of Santa Fe County Geographic Information Systems' mission.
Online_Linkage: http://www.santafecountynm.gov/growth_management/gis
Description:
Abstract:
Between March 12 and August 11, 2014, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data was acquired over the entirety of Santa Fe County (SFCO) in New Mexico, as well as portions of Rio Arriba, Taos, Mora, Los Alamos, San Miguel, Torrance, Sandoval and Bernalillo Counties. The project area covers approximately 3,000 square miles of urban, desert, and mountain areas. The LiDAR data were acquired to meet a US Geological Survey (USGS) Quality Level 2 (QL2) standard. LiDAR acquisition of the project was broken into five quadrants captured under normal ground conditions. The LiDAR acquisition platform for the Santa Fe County project was a turbocharged Cessna 206 equipped with an Optech ALTM Orion H300 LiDAR sensor, collecting multiple return x, y, and z values. This classified point cloud LiDAR dataset was developed from the acquired flight line strips. Two identical series of these classified point cloud data were created according to the two project tiling schemes—SFCO (Public Land Survey System (PLSS) section-based overlapping tiles) and USGS (non-overlapping, edge-matched 5000’x5000’ tiles). Classified point cloud datasets for the Santa Fe County series cover 3256 individual data tiles established for data processing and deliverable purposes.
Purpose:
The purpose of this project is to support activities throughout Santa Fe County, including but not limited to urban, community and regional planning; project and infrastructure planning; project reporting; floodplain mapping; stormwater management; vegetation analysis; change detection; and initial project reviews.
Supplemental_Information:
The bounding rectangle provided within the Geographic Extent metadata section represent the Santa Fe County 2014 Regional LiDAR Project Area in which the classified point cloud LiDAR elevation data is located. This project developed deliverable data derived from the integration of multiple sources of elevation information including: LiDAR data and supplemental breaklines collected from UltraCAM Eagle (UCE) stereo digital photography captured as part of the same project. This project metadata describes the project-wide characteristics and procedures employed in development of the tiled data that comprise the entire geographic extent.
Lidar_Information:
Lidar_Collection_Information:
Lidar_Specification: USGS-NGP Base LiDAR Specification v1.4
Lidar_Sensor: Optech ALTM Orion H300 LiDAR sensor
Lidar_Maximum_Returns: 4
Lidar_Nominal_Pulse_Spacing:
Post Spacing was used. Quadrants 1 and 5 - down track = 0.6993m, cross track = 0.7002m, Quadrants 2, 3, and 4 - down track = 0.7015, cross track = 0.7016m
Lidar_Nominal_Pulse_Density: Quadrants 1 and 5 = 2.42 PPM, Quadrants 2, 3, and 4 = 2.37 PPM
Lidar_Aggregate_Nominal_Pulse_Spacing: 0.69
Lidar_Aggregate_Nominal_Pulse_Density: 2.13
Lidar_Flight_Height:
Quadrants 1 and 5 - 4039 (ft AGL), Quadrants 2, 3, and 4 - 3,250 (ft AGL)
Lidar_Flight_Speed:
Quadrants 1 and 5 - 105 (kts), Quadrants 2, 3, and 4 - 120 (kts)
Lidar_Scan_Angle:
Quadrants 1 and 5 - 24 (full), Quadrants 2, 3, and 4 - 38 (full)
Lidar_Scan_Frequency: Quadrants 1 and 5 - 42.3 Hz, Quadrants 2, 3, and 4 - 44 Hz
Lidar_Pulse_Rate: Quadrants 1 and 5 - 75 kHz, Quadrants 2, 3, and 4 - 100 kHz
Lidar_Pulse_Duration: 4
Lidar_Pulse_Width: Please contact Optech, Inc. inquiries@teledyneoptech.com
Lidar_Central_Wavelength: 1064
Lidar_Multiple_Pulses_In_Air: 4
Lidar_Beam_Divergence: 0.25
Lidar_Swath_Width: Quadrants 1 and 5 - 523.36 m, Quadrants 2, 3, and 4 - 682.18 m
Lidar_Swath_Overlap: Quadrants 1 and 5 - 30%, Quadrants 2, 3, and 4 - 30%
Lidar_Geoid: NAVD88(Geoid12a)
Lidar_Accuracy_Information:
Lidar_Calculated_Horizontal_Accuracy: Quadrants 1 and 5 = 0.54 ft., Quadrants 2, 3, and 4 = 0.43 ft.
Lidar_Raw_Nonvegetated_Vertical_Accuracy: 0.082
Lidar_Raw_Nonvegetated_Vertical_Accuracy_Checkpoints: 340
Lidar_Classified_Nonvegetated_Vertical_Accuracy: 0.075
Lidar_Classified_Nonvegetated_Vertical_Accuracy_Checkpoints: 151
Lidar_Classified_Vegetated_Vertical_Accuracy: 0.11
Lidar_Classified_Vegetated_Vertical_Accuracy_Checkpoints: 185
Lidar_LAS_Information:
Lidar_LAS_Version: 1.4
Lidar_LAS_Point_Record_Format: 6
Lidar_LAS_Witheld_Point_Identifier: No withheld (ignore) points were identified
Lidar_LAS_Overage_Point_Identifier: No swath "overage" points were identified
Lidar_LAS_Radiometric_Resolution: 12
Lidar_LAS_Classification:
Lidar_LAS_Class_Code: 1
Lidar_LAS_Class_Description: Processed, but unclassified
Lidar_LAS_Classification:
Lidar_LAS_Class_Code: 2
Lidar_LAS_Class_Description: Bare earth
Lidar_LAS_Classification:
Lidar_LAS_Class_Code: 9
Lidar_LAS_Class_Description: Water
Lidar_LAS_Classification:
Lidar_LAS_Class_Code: 10
Lidar_LAS_Class_Description: Ignored ground (near a breakline)
Lidar_LAS_Classification:
Lidar_LAS_Class_Code: 17
Lidar_LAS_Class_Description: Bridge decks
Lidar_LAS_Classification:
Lidar_LAS_Class_Code: 18
Lidar_LAS_Class_Description: High noise
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 20140312
Ending_Date: 20140811
Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: As needed
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -106.258185
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -105.610697
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 36.253707
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 34.990690
Lidar_Bounding_Coordinates:
Left_Bounding_Coordinate: 1635000
Right_Bounding_Coordinate: 1830000
Top_Bounding_Coordinate: 1915000
Bottom_Bounding_Coordinate: 1450000
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Category
Theme_Keyword: topography
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/tgn/
Place_Keyword: Santa Fe County
Place_Keyword: Rio Arriba County
Place_Keyword: Taos County
Place_Keyword: Mora County
Place_Keyword: Los Alamos County
Place_Keyword: San Miguel County
Place_Keyword: Torrance County
Place_Keyword: Sandoval County
Place_Keyword: Bernalillo County
Place_Keyword: New Mexico
Place_Keyword: United States of America
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:
Neither Santa Fe County, nor Bohannan Huston, Inc. (BHI) assumes liability for misuse of the data. Data should be used at the scale for which they were intended. No warranty, expressed, or implied, is made by Santa Fe County nor BHI regarding the utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute such warranty.
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Santa Fe County
Contact_Person: Erle Wright, GISP
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing address
Address: 102 Grant Avenue
City: Santa Fe
State_or_Province: NM
Postal_Code: 87501
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: ewright@santafecountynm.gov
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: rdzur@bhinc.com
Native_Data_Set_Environment:
Intergraph GeoMedia Professional Ver. 14.00.0002.00088; Intergraph ERDAS IMAGINE 2014 Ver. 14.00.0100 Build 715; FME Desktop 2015.0 (Build 15244); Window 7 Enterprise SP1; las files total ~1.4 TB
Data_Quality_Information:
Logical_Consistency_Report:
Point cloud data set were collected from a variety of active and passive remote sensing technologies including LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and very large scale aerial photography for orthophoto rectification and feature interpretation of ground and non-ground surface data. Both automated and manual interpretation of these sources contribute to the classification of the point cloud.
Completeness_Report:
Deliverable data tiles were inspected to ensure complete terrain data coverage to the extent possible with overlapping LiDAR strip data within individual tiles. Therefore data tiles may be comprised of multiple flight line data sources including classified LiDAR point data. Sources covering the site are defined by flight line index information.
Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report: Tested 1.5 ft horizontal accuracy (NSSDA).
Quantitative_Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Assessment:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Value: 1.5
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Explanation:
LiDAR point cloud data were tested horizontally with 65 paneled or otherwise visible ground control points. Comparison of the horizontal ground control coordinates to the corresponding control point locations on LiDAR intensity imagery (with 2 ft GSD) were measured at the visible center of each control point panel to form the basis of the horizontal test. Reported accuracies developed from the sample of 65 control points exhibit a horizontal RMSE of 0.9 ft or 0.27 m.
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy:
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
Tested 0.28 ft (8.4 cm) vertical accuracy (RMZEz, nonvegetated), 0.54 ft (16.6 cm) NSSDA NVA at 95-percent confidence level, and 0.35 ft (10.8 cm) VVA at 95th percentile.
Quantitative_Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Assessment:
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Value: 0.28
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Explanation:
Point cloud data were tested with 41 independent check points utilizing points surveyed through OPUS projects and well-distributed across the entire project area. The point cloud test elevation values were queried at the corresponding horizontal (x,y) location of the check point by draping the point on a triangulated surface constructed from the LiDAR points. Land cover reporting groups were determined according to the National Land Cover Database (NLCD). These test point cloud derived elevation values were compared to the independent z elevation values for the check point with corresponding results compiled into the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA) vertical accuracy assessment template spreadsheet.
Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Bohannan Huston, Inc.
Publication_Date: 20141027
Title: Survey Control Report for SANTA FE COUNTY
Source_Scale_Denominator: 240
Type_of_Source_Media: Portable Document Format
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 20141027
Source_Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: 20140344 Santa Fe Control Report REVISED 10-27-2014 SIGNED.pdf
Source_Contribution:
Geodetic control was established for the project to provide a primary control network for LiDAR and orthophotography mapping in the project coordinate system.
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Aero-Graphics Inc.
Publication_Date: 20140924
Title:
Airborne LiDAR Collection - Optech Orion H300 laser scanner with Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and on-board Global Positioning System (GPS).
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: LiDAR Point Cloud
Source_Scale_Denominator: 600
Type_of_Source_Media: Hard drive
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 20140312
Ending_Date: 20140811
Source_Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: SFCO2014_LiDAR_SWATH.shp
Source_Contribution:
LIDAR data was captured using an Optech ALTM Orion H300 LiDAR system with an inertial measurement unit (IMU) and dual frequency GPS receiver. Project acquisition with LiDAR sensors was organized into 5 acquisition blocks or “quadrants”. Quadrants 1 and 5 predominantly covered the more mountainous areas of the project with more significant relief. Quadrants 2, 3, and 4 were acquired over the primarily flatter desert areas. Data acquisition across the project was designed to achieve a 0.7 m nominal pulse spacing (NPS).
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Aero-Graphics Inc.
Publication_Date: 20140924
Title:
Airborne Collection - Microsoft/Vexcel UltraCam Eagle (UCE) digital camera system with Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and on-board Global Positioning System (GPS).
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Image
Source_Scale_Denominator: 1200
Type_of_Source_Media: Hard drive
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 20140310
Ending_Date: 20140620
Source_Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: SFCO2014_PHOTO_FOOTPRINTS.shp
Source_Contribution:
Digital aerial imagery was collected at a nominal average altitude of 9,466 ft above ground level (AGL) using the Microsoft/Vexcel UltraCam Eagle (UCE) digital camera system. The UCE aerial imagery served the purpose of supporting the production of 6 inch ground sample distance (GSD) resolution digital orthoimagery for interpretive value in evaluation and development of LiDAR-elevation products.
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: USDA Aerial Photography Field Office (APFO)
Publication_Date: 20150313
Title: National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) Imagery
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Image
Online_Linkage:
http://gis.apfo.usda.gov/arcgis/services/NAIP/New_Mexico_2014_1m/ImageServer/WMSServer?
Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2014
Source_Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: New_Mexico_2014_1m_NC
Source_Contribution:
For project areas outside of the UCE aerial imagery coverage, 2014 NAIP imagery with a 1m GSD resolution was used to support interpretive value in evaluation and development of LiDAR-elevation products. In particular over these NAIP areas, imagery supported the definition of 2D polygons utilized in waterbody hydro flattening and point classification.
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
1. LiDAR Calibration/Automatic Classification. After initial data post processing, point cloud data processing included calibration to project ground control and initial automated classification of point cloud data. LiDAR data were inventoried and tested for preliminary vertical accuracy verification against project control. Point cloud source data were processed initially as ground (class 2) or non-ground points (class 1) by quadrant through automated means in TerraScan® software.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SFCO2014_LiDAR_SWATH.shp
Process_Date: 20140924
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Aero-Graphics, Inc.
Contact_Person: Casey Francis, CP
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing
Address: 40 West Oakland Avenue
City: Salt Lake City
State_or_Province: UT
Postal_Code: 84115
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 801-487-3273
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: sales@aero-graphics.com
Hours_of_Service: Monday - Friday 08:00am - 5:00pm
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
2. Production Staging. Analysis of point cloud data by quadrant was conducted to produce full production tile. This inventory step ensured that overlapping production tiles were considered to provide for a consistent production tiling scheme without overlap. Once a production tiling scheme was organized, a full set of quality control (QC) shaded relief products were derived from the initial automatic classification using Geospatial Data Abstraction Library (GDAL) Utilities. Data processing priorities were also established with higher priority given to production tiles over areas of project orthophotography coverage.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SFCO2014_LiDAR_SWATH.shp
Process_Date: 20150410
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Bohannan Huston, Inc.
Contact_Person: Robert Dzur
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 7500 Jefferson St. NE
City: Albuquerque
State_or_Province: NM
Postal_Code: 87109
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 505-823-1000
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 505-798-7932
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: rdzur@bhinc.com
Hours_of_Service: Monday - Thursday 07:30am - 5:30pm; Friday 07:30am - 12:00pm
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
3. Review and Classification. Shaded relief QC products were distributed to analysts for review. Analysts placed polygonal calls identifying anomalies categorized into building, bridge, pit/spike, mine, ridge, and other. Building calls drove manual reclassification of points from ground to unclassified using ERDAS Imagine. Bridge calls drove 3D stereo collection of breakline features and subsequent manual review to ensure correct classification of all ground points around breaklines and bridge decks. Pit/Spike calls were addressed through automatically reclassification by statistical means which explored for data outliers falling outside of three (3) standard deviations from the mean surface. Polygonal ridge calls were used as a data clipper to clip out relevant sections of the point cloud for reclassification of the section using ERDAS Imagine. Once the ridge segment was reclassified in ERDAS it was merged back into the original production classified point cloud. A feedback loop at the end of the review and classification process provided an updated shaded relief image. A second analyst verified all calls to ensure correct classification.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SFCO2014_LiDAR_SWATH.shp
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SFCO2014_PHOTO_FOOTPRINTS.shp
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: New_Mexico_2014_1m_NC
Process_Date: 20150410
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Bohannan Huston, Inc.
Contact_Person: Robert Dzur
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 7500 Jefferson St. NE
City: Albuquerque
State_or_Province: NM
Postal_Code: 87109
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 505-823-1000
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 505-798-7932
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: rdzur@bhinc.com
Hours_of_Service: Monday - Thursday 07:30am - 5:30pm; Friday 07:30am - 12:00pm
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
4. Breakline Classification. Breakline data was integrated for use in classification of point cloud data. Breaklines were used as reference in particular to classify water (9), Ignored ground (near a breakline) (10) and bridge decks (17). For waterbodies, extracted breaklines were conditioned to the LiDAR elevation using a review of contours and shaded relief imagery. LiDAR was also utilized to extract a geomorphic definition of the Rio Grande and Rio Chama river channel. This polygon was verified over 2014 imagery and used to classify water and subsequently in DEM hydro-flattening procedures on USGS data tiles. River waterbody point classification took precedence over breakline classification. Bridges, breakline and wall (special breakline) features were buffered 2 ft on either side to classify about 1 point on each side of the breakline as class ten (10). The order of operations for breakline classification included priority treatment of bridges, then water, breakline, wall, and culvert spans. For bridge decks, the 3D classification of these elements attempt to interpret and classify the bridge deck as a plane with bridge classification (17) and vertical superstructure as (1).
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SFCO2014_LiDAR_SWATH.shp
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: SFCO2014_PHOTO_FOOTPRINTS.shp
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: New_Mexico_2014_1m_NC
Process_Date: 20150410
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Bohannan Huston, Inc.
Contact_Person: Robert Dzur
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 7500 Jefferson St. NE
City: Albuquerque
State_or_Province: NM
Postal_Code: 87109
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 505-823-1000
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 505-798-7932
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: rdzur@bhinc.com
Hours_of_Service: Monday - Thursday 07:30am - 5:30pm; Friday 07:30am - 12:00pm
Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Vector
Point_and_Vector_Object_Information:
SDTS_Terms_Description:
SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: Point
Point_and_Vector_Object_Count: 47,623,199,926
Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Grid_Coordinate_System:
Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: State Plane Coordinate System 1983
State_Plane_Coordinate_System:
SPCS_Zone_Identifier: 3002
Transverse_Mercator:
Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.9999
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -106.25
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 31.0
False_Easting: 1640416.667
False_Northing: 0.0
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: coordinate pair
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution: 0.000000007285694270109391
Ordinate_Resolution: 0.000000007285694270109391
Planar_Distance_Units: foot_us
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983 (HARN)
Ellipsoid_Name: Geodetic Reference System 80
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257222101
Vertical_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Altitude_System_Definition:
Altitude_Datum_Name: North American Vertical Datum of 1988
Altitude_Resolution: 0.001
Altitude_Distance_Units: Feet
Altitude_Encoding_Method:
Explicit elevation coordinate included with horizontal coordinates
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Overview_Description:
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview: This section is not required for LiDAR LAS deliverables.
Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11b4/pdf/tm11-B4.pdf National Geospatial Program LiDAR Base Specification Chapter 4 of Section B, U.S. Geological Survey Standards Book 11, Collection and Delineation of Spatial Data U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 11–B4 Version 1.0, August 2012 Version 1.1, October 2014 Version 1.2, November 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Santa Fe County, New Mexico
Contact_Person: Erle Wright, GISP
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 102 Grant Ave
City: Santa Fe
State_or_Province: NM
Postal_Code: 87501-2061
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (505)986-6350
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: ewright@santafecountynm.gov
Resource_Description:
Leave blank unless an organization outside of USGS has distribution rights to the data.
Distribution_Liability:
Leave blank unless an organization outside of USGS has distribution rights to the data.
Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20161124
Metadata_Review_Date: 051515
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Bohannan Huston Inc.
Contact_Person: Robert Dzur
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 7500 Jefferson St NE
City: Albuquerque
State_or_Province: NM
Postal_Code: 87109
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 505-823-1000
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 505-798-7932
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: rdzur@bhinc.com
Hours_of_Service: Monday through Friday 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM (Mountain Time)
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Metadata_Access_Constraints: None.
Metadata_Use_Constraints:
Neither Santa Fe County, nor Bohannan Huston, Inc. (BHI) assumes liability for misuse of the data. Data should be used at the scale for which they were intended. No warranty, expressed, or implied, is made by Santa Fe County nor BHI regarding the utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution constitute such warranty.
Metadata_Security_Information:
Metadata_Security_Classification_System: None.
Metadata_Security_Classification: Unclassified
Metadata_Security_Handling_Description: None.
Metadata_Extensions:
Online_Linkage: None
Profile_Name: None
Generated by mp version 2.9.35 on Fri Nov 25 10:11:03 2016